OPINION: The Vigilante Mainstream Media

You may also like...

2 Responses

  1. MIKE MAUNDER says:

    Back in the 1930s the media were able to keep quiet about the goings on of Edward VIII, even when the American and European medias got their hands on some of the details. Edward would have been an embarrassment to the Nation, had he not abdicated, and yet the home media, almost as one, decided to hold the storys. Little by little, hints appeared, but no in depth detail until the abdication, then front page with pictures.
    Now I, with most British, don’t want to be kept in the dark on news. What I do want is just a little common sense, viewed via our Laws, with innocence held until proof of guilt. This is one reason why I don’t have a regular newspaper delivered, and only buy one on passing a newsagent, if there may be something worth reading about. I find that there are enough news channels on the internet.
    Carl Sergeant is dead by his own hand. It is possible that we will never find the truth about him. The wide media of this Nation took it on themselves to jump the gun of proven detail, with something of a hatchet job. The whole multi piece grouping of the media, now stand in the dock of our Decency Court, but then I don’t suppose that will bother them in any way, will it ? It wasn’t me gov, it was all of them, and anyway, there’s no smoke without fire, init !

  2. John Carins says:

    There are a lot of unsavoury things going on in the Labour party. Yet the media or other parties are failing to make Labour accountable. Corbyn is getting away it. He is the leader, he is responsible.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *