Royal Wedding 2018: A Royal Love Story

Abigail Eatock

I joined UKIP as I believe that only UKIP are committed to providing true and fair democracy to Britain. As well as being a Politics and International Relations student at the University of York, I was also Chair of the UKIP society in York, as well as the Media Officer for YI UKIP Students. I was the Events Manager for the Peter Whittle leadership campaign. I am also an intern for The Bow Group, writing on UK and international security affairs.

You may also like...

4 Responses

  1. Marilyn Catling says:

    To top off a wonderful day, wouldn’t a walk away from negotiations with the EU next week be the icing on the cake! We could certainly use the 40 billion pounds for the NHS, Housing, our forces and roads and as insurance until the rules change for us to trade with the world. We can then return to the heady days of being free from the ties that have bound us for more than forty years. Here’s to Harry and Megan ❤️

  2. Gavin says:

    Err, hello, you do realise Harry isn’t even Charles’s son, right? James Hewitt is his father. He’s not even royal, so the whole thing is a sham.

    • MIKE MAUNDER says:

      Sorry Gavin, but this is wrong ! It has been stated by so called ‘informed’ people, but the dates don’t work for Harry’s birth and Hewitt’s involvement. Here in Northampton we have Althorp, and I well remember seeing the Spencer family many times. It is by connection with that family that we have a ginger Harry, and hair challenged William, but your free to believe what you wish !

  3. MIKE MAUNDER says:

    First of all Abigail, although I’m not into the Royal wedding interest, I did watch it and thoroughly loved it. It was a spectacular, and just shows how this old country can pull out all the stops when required ! I hold William and Harry both in high regard, and Diana’s input is clearly seen in both of them. The ‘Old Guard’ has to take note !
    I could not help pondering on the Princes Margaret and Townsend matter, many years ago now. Clearly there is no direct parallel to Prince Harry and Megan, but she is a divorcee, and I’m sure HRH The Queen has thought long and hard on that ! Although that is now history, Margaret, like Harry, was well down the line for becoming our Monarch. The intrusion into Margaret’s private life was utterly wrong by State and Church, and made Margaret what she became !
    Upon this matter stands Charles and Camilla. Both divorcees and adulterers, but with Charles next in line for the Crown ! By his own reported comments, he wants the Coronation Oath to be unchanged. This follows his thoughts, and others thoughts, for a change in wording, but the oath has about three centuries of history to it. Charles and the Church of England have to get unity on this. Is the CofE to be cut lose from the State, or is the Church prepared to anoint an unsuitable Monarch ? Of course what should happen is Charles abdication in favour of William, but that would require an honourable action ! Wouldn’t it ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *