Tory MP: ‘Brexit Vote Was Just A Tantrum By The Working Class’

In an astonishing outburst, the Europe Minister Sir Alan Duncan MP (pictured above) has slammed the Brexit vote as a ‘tantrum by the working class’. He said that Leave voters had used the referendum to complain about immigration and to protest about ‘foreigners taking jobs that they themselves would refuse to do’. He said that there should have been a ‘turnout threshold’ to ensure a ‘sensible’ result.

He also warned that labour shortages after Brexit “could cause us a lot of damage”, especially in the National Health Service.

A remain supporter, Duncan was speaking at the Chicago Council of Global Affairs, where he twice complained about the way in which the leave campaign, which was fronted by his boss, Boris Johnson, sought to stir up prejudice about immigration.

He said it was “undeniably true” that young people had overwhelmingly voted against Brexit, but had to face its consequences over the next 20-30 years.

Speaking in a question-and-answer session in Chicago, Duncan displayed a sharp contrast with Johnson’s position, as he strayed from the official script that Britain is going to be a larger global player once it has left the EU, explaining instead the task ahead was to convert something that could prove a disaster into an opportunity.

Duncan hinted the UK might not seek an early free trade deal with the US at all, insisting the first trade deal the UK needed was with its closest trading partners in the European Union.

Asked why Boston in Lincolnshire voted so heavily for Brexit when it was so dependent on Polish immigrant labour for its agriculture, he replied: “That is one of the paradoxes. Lincolnshire folk said ‘ooh, they are coming to pinch our jobs’. Well, they would not do the jobs themselves anyway so it was a rather artificial anger.

“It is less worrying to our agriculture than it is to our health service and our care sector. So many of the labour problems that might follow from this could cause us quite a lot of damage.”

Discussing the validity of the Brexit referendum itself, Duncan said: “I agree with you in principle that constitutional changes should have thresholds of some sort either in turnout or percentage voting. It is a very very strong argument.”

He pointed out the devolution referendum in 1979 had a threshold since it had to be supported by at least 40% of those entitled to vote, adding: “That is why it did not go through in Wales”.

Discussing the Brexit referendum, he said: “The manner in which the campaign was fought stirred up a lot of sentiment amongst people that are not habitual voters, particularly on the issue of immigration. You could feel in the last 10 days of the campaign, traditional blue-collar urban Labour opinion going viral for leave. They were stirred up by an image of immigration, which made them angry and throw a bit of a tantrum. That was part of the chemistry that explains the result.”

He added: “The remain campaign was badly conducted in that the then government led by David Cameron and George Osborne hogged the campaign limelight and it did not look as though the remain argument put a vision of optimism. Nor did it appear a cross-party endeavour and that made elements of voting opinion treat it as a verdict on the government of the day”.

He admitted he had been surprised by the result. “I was a remainer. I thought, as most people that had political antennae, that they thought worked that it would be 52 remain to 48 leave. It turned out to be the other way round.”

Asked about the place of the UK in a free trade deal with the US, Duncan said: “I would like to think there is no queue.”

Discussing a deal with the US, he said the UK already conducted a lot of business across the Atlantic. “Whether we need a free trade deal or not will become clear. There is not one at the moment with the EU. So business is happening in the absence of a free trade agreement.

“A free trade agreement is not the answer to everything but where one can be designed and agreed in a way that is mutually advantageous to both sides that will be of benefit. We do hope to have free trade agreements across the world but the one that will matter to us enormously is the one we have with the 27 countries in the EU itself.”

Additional reporting by The Guardian.

Westmonster Dave is the News Editor of Kipper Central.

Support Kipper Central

Kipper Central is here to spread the real news with the British and global public, without political correctness and without lies.
However, we are an extremely small team each putting in several hours a day, despite none of us having full-time jobs.
We, therefore, rely on the kind support of our readers to keep reporting on the stories that nobody else will and to keep promoting what is truly happening in Britain and across the world.

You may also like...

5 Responses

  1. John Foord says:

    Typical Remainer. Still fighting the fight. And still not understanding why we voted to leave. I voted to leave because I wanted my country to be self determining again. immigration was only a small part of the overall issue.

    Whilst being able to recognise that there was a problem with, say, uncontrolled immigration causing logistical problems in some areas which were affecting the lives of the local people – but NOT BEING ABLE TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT.

    Whilst being able to recognise that there was a problem with NOT BEING ABLE to deport criminals AND having to fund their lives.

    Whilst knowing that the British people voted to join a Common Market (a good idea) but have never been asked if they wanted political union with the rest of Europe.

    Having to watch as our proud nation was being subsumed into a dictatorship and being pushed further and further down, whilst the countries that had once depended upon the British ‘we will fight them on the beaches’ spirit, take charge and tell us to shut up.

    It is those who voted to remain, who 1. Did not understand the question. 2. have a vested interest in staying. 3. decided for some simple reason, like it being easier to go on holiday. 4. Were quite happy to lose their democratic rights.

  2. I would really to like know who this Sir Alan Duncan thinks he is call all Brexiteers working class, besides I could of worse things than being working class – like EU pensioned, self-serving old farts like Sir Duncan. HE WILL GET A TANTRUM IF HE STANDS IN THE WAY OF BREXIT!!!

  3. Donald Hallam says:

    Sign and share this petition to LEAVE the EU immediately;

  4. As a working class simpleton, I obviously could not understand that the clear antipathy shown by the leading EU countries, France and Germany, was fully justifed! I am sure that Alan Duncan can explain why he is so right and we working class idiots are so wrong! There will be another election in the future, and if he and his ‘Remoaner’ collegues keep on undermining Ms May, it may be sooner than we expect; perhaps Mr Duncan will be able to explain, in words of no more than two syllables, why they should vote for him !!

  5. John Wright says:

    John Foord’s answer pretty well says it all! But, just for that arrogant idiot MP Duncan, what part of wanting our Country back don’t you understand? What part of being able to administer our own affairs, from who we trade with to how we run our legal systems don’t you understand? What are the huge advantages in being run by an unelected, irremovable & frankly, pretty mundane & inept group of self appointed nonentities Mr Duncan? And why are you so dismissive towards those 17.4 million people calling them “Tantrum throwing Working Class” Mr Duncan? Did “diddums” become so upset because we leavers beat the odds, or was it more likely he was in receipt of something of value which he knew he was going to lose? Would you like to respond Mr Duncan?, perhaps you’d also like to remind us of your “iffy” past as well Mr Duncan? Like so many of our ‘whiter than white’ politico’s, you Mr Duncan should remember to engage your brain before opening your big mouth, I accept this is likely to be difficult, especially for one who thinks he knows everything, but knows very little?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *