MPs Warned European Court Of Justice Can Block Final Brexit Deal

The UK’s former representative at the European Court of Justice (ECJ), Sir Konrad Schiemann, has warned MPs that even if Britain makes an agreement with the other 27 EU countries then this final deal can still be struck down by the ECJ.

He warned that if any of the agreement was ruled to be illegal under European law the deal would have to be renegotiated.

Sir Schiemann said: “Any agreement that is made between the EU and parliament is subject to challenge in the European Court of Justice on the subject of powers of the parties who have made that agreement.

“So the Commission and the people negotiating on behalf of the EU are faced with this problem: They can’t just do what they think is good.

“They have got to remain within their powers.”

Asked if the withdrawal terms could be challenged by European judges, he said: “Certainly in so far as they touch on the role of the ECJ.

“If you exclude the ECJ altogether and for example try and set up a different tribunal — this has been done in various other draft treaties — sometimes the ECJ has said yes that will work and other times it has said it won’t.”

Sir Schiemann described withdrawal as “an absolute can of worms” and went on to take an apparent swipe at the PM’s state of readiness ahead of triggering Article 50 earlier this year.

He added: “I don’t think anybody had thought it through when they put through Article 50.

“Now someone is trying to operate it and it poses a number of very considerable problems.”

It comes as diplomats claim hardliners in Germany are blocking the European Commission’s chief Brexit negotiator from opening trade talks with the UK.

According to reports, Michel Barnier, who is heading the Commission’s Brexit team, is pushing for trade talks to begin as soon as possible.

But sources in Brussels have said that Angela Merkel’s government in Berlin, which has been significantly damaged after big electoral losses last month, is holding out for Britain to agree to pay a massive divorce bill of up to £78billion.

Mrs Merkel is worried that Germany will have to pick up the bill when the EU loses Britain’s net contribution of more than £10billion a year.

She is understood to be unhappy with Theresa May’s generous offer to keep paying contributions during a transition period.

A diplomat reportedly told a Brussels correspondent: “Germany wants more and it wants it more or less in writing. That is toxic for the British.”

A Brussels source has suggested that Mr Barnier has instead advised that while “sufficient progress” has not been made to move on to talks the “positive atmosphere” following Theresa May’s speech in Florence means that second stage talks should begin.

Westmonster Dave is the News Editor of Kipper Central.

Support Kipper Central

Kipper Central is here to spread the real news with the British and global public, without political correctness and without lies.
However, we are an extremely small team each putting in several hours a day, despite none of us having full-time jobs.
We, therefore, rely on the kind support of our readers to keep reporting on the stories that nobody else will and to keep promoting what is truly happening in Britain and across the world.

You may also like...

3 Responses

  1. Barrie Greratorex says:

    So what is the Legal position if we just walk away and declare ourselves no longer part of this Organisation? Please try not to refer to the ransom as a “Divorce” settlement, we were never married to it, we became members of what is possibly an illegal entity, we are withdrawing our membership and owe nothing in arrears. Treaties have been made and broken many times in history, they become invalid if it no longer serves the interests of all parties concerned. If not then what is the International courts jurisdiction over such a Treaty, as surely only International Law can be the final adjudicator here? Excuse my ignorance and confusion but some clarity would be nice.

  2. MIKE MAUNDER says:

    So surely this only goes to prove that walking away from everything EU, is the most cost effective, and simple way to proceed. Lets do it. NOW !

  3. Anthony Taylor says:

    Let the ECJ try to pull that stunt, a rude awakening awaits!

    With regard to MegaloMerkle, when Germany pays full reparation to Italy and Greece etal, then she can crawl with cap in hand for a 78 pence contribution from the U.K.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *