David Kurten: Let UKIP be the Party to Stand Up to the Madness of This Post-modern Cultural Marxist Claptrap


Hardly a day goes by in the United Kingdom of the present decade without another piece of politically correct insanity being applied to undermine the foundations of our society. In the last few years, the so-called transgender agenda has appeared as if out of nowhere, and although the vast majority of people in the country can hardly believe that such nonsense is being taken seriously, there is a concerted multi-spectrum action from the establishment to normalize it.

People could have hardly imagined only five years ago that it would be considered be politically incorrect to use words like ‘mother’ and ‘father’. Indeed, when people began to suggest this, it was considered somewhat of a joke. No longer.

The latest edict from the government is to insist that government staff i.e. those who work in the civil service, should not use traditional pronouns ‘he’ or ‘she’ in case a minute number of confused narcissists feel offended. Failure to comply is known as ‘misgedering’. This is when you refuse to use someone’s self applied pronoun, even if they are obviously a man or a woman.

According to ‘genderqueer theory’ a person is not male or female – they choose their gender from moment to moment out of 60 or so genders as they feel like it, and thus there are a concurrent number of different pronouns to match the different available genders Most of these new pronouns sound like they are lifted from the Chinese alphabet; ‘zhe’, ‘hin’, ‘won’, etc.

This may sound like a Kafka-esque joke, but it is quite serious. Misgendering someone is now a sanctionable offence in the civil service. This follows on from London Underground’s missive earlier in the year that staff should not say ‘ladies and gentlemen’ in announcements, as it is a ‘non-inclusive’ greeting.

More worryingly, the Crown Prosecution Service has issued new guidelines making transphobic hate crime an offence to be pursued, and ‘misgendering’ is on the way to becoming a hate crime. In Canada, which is further along the progressive path to hell, it already is.

It is not surprising that the current far-left Labour party sees all this as a wonderful sign of progress. It beggars belief however, that the so-called ‘Conservative’ party is fully behind it as well, and is driving to push this nonsense on school children of an ever-younger age, including primary school children, whose natural development as boys and girls will be severely damaged if they are exposed to such harmful and confusing unscientific ideology at a young age.

Although it is not yet compulsory, many local education authority areas already provide ‘educational materials’ to primary school children which teach them about ‘genderqueer theory’ – and it is likely to become compulsory next year with no parental veto when Education Secretary Justine Greening applies a statutory instrument to make it so.

UKIP must be the party which stands up to this insanity – all the other political parties in Great Britain have been taken over by cultural Marxists; the DUP in Northern Ireland is a notable exception. Cultural Marxists have an agenda to dissolve the nation into the EU, undermine the family and marriage, and now, to introduce gender chaos into our youngest generation at an age so young and vulnerable that it will be difficult, if not impossible, to undo the damage.

The vast majority of people in the country want to scream at their newspapers and television screens and say this is madness, but the thought police work in subtle ways and as the silent majority silences itself, the insanity deepens.

Let us in UKIP be the party to stand up to the madness, to call it out, to give ordinary British people to courage to join us too and say no to this post-modern cultural Marxist claptrap.

If not us, then who? If not us, we are lost.

Support Kipper Central

Kipper Central is here to spread the real news with the British and global public, without political correctness and without lies.
However, we are an extremely small team each putting in several hours a day, despite none of us having full-time jobs.
We, therefore, rely on the kind support of our readers to keep reporting on the stories that nobody else will and to keep promoting what is truly happening in Britain and across the world.


You may also like...

9 Responses

  1. Stanley Cutts says:

    Fully understand and support your message here David. And I would also question why UKIP should have a distinct “LGBT” group. Is it a question of ” all people are equal, but some are more equal than others”?

  2. Barrie Greratorex says:

    To that I cannot add anything except perhaps to say you are a very brave MAN indeed.

  3. Dr Lisa Nolland says:

    Thank you so much, David. Brilliant! If people can decide to be a man today, a woman, tomorrow, why stop there? Indeed, ageism is a real problem, so why not allow people to choose what age they would like to be? And of course it can change, that is the fun bit of it! If I can get perks for being a pensioner today, well, why not? But if I would like a youth discount tomorrow, I will simply lower my age. Simples! In fact, this is pure lunacy and most of us know it. David needs to help UKIP lead the way out of this madness.

  4. Thostids says:

    So, it’s going to become a criminal offence to not use the pronoun some mentally unstable narcissist is demanding be used “de jour”.
    Picture the scene, remake of “The Blue Light”, Dixon (of Dock Green) chases Dirk Bogarde into darkened building. Bogarde, holding pistol, “Come and get me, Copper”.
    Dixon, in kindly fashion, “Come along lad. Give me the gun. And don’t call me Copper. It has sexist racist connotations and belittles my present choice of the pronoun “Zhe” as i’m wearing my little pink silk knickers.”
    Bogarde looks to the heavens. He could see this was not going to end well. A raving pooftah copper in silk knickers. He could get at least 3years in jug for not using the right pronoun. Shit…he was going to have to shoot him and go for the terrorist’s defence and a community sentence.
    “Bang!”.

  5. MIKE MAUNDER says:

    David Kurten, Thank you for your blast against the misuse of the English language. It would appear that I am insulting someone on a regular basis with my letters that open with Dear Sir !
    Here in the East Midlands, in Northampton, and within my age group, ( 70s and above ), it seems that we have avoided being targeted by this stupidity, and it could be that those strange folk who want to mess things up, have seen us as not having too many years left to us, and the children are to be the targets.
    I well remember in my schooldays, hearing slang words to describe homosexuals. That was very wrong, and as we came to understand more about these sexual differences, rightly the law against these folk was changed. It would seem that making an informed change to the standing of these people, was seen by them to be the green light for the minority to rule !
    We can see this as being anti-democratic, and is therefore something to knock out of our National life. I take your point, that UKIP will have to shoulder this problem, but you will open the gate for the descriptive of the Party, to be homophobic. Why can’t LGBT folk just get on with their lives, without having to advertise their gender preference ?
    Please be very careful of these little items. They could be stones on the path that knock UKIP off balance to the main work that has to be done. Abolition of FPTP. Correct PR voting. Getting totally clear of the EU. Making our way by trade in the wide world. etc., etc. These are the main reasons for the UKIP Party, and stumbling over sexual preferences are not !

  6. Tarian says:

    Surely transgender is a mental issue ?
    And as we know, there is no stigma to mental health.

    On any objective measure, one or more of the following applies:
    – psychosis : “a person cannot tell what is real from what is imagined. ”
    – schizophrenia : “Sometimes they believe they are someone else, such as a famous historical figure”
    – Dissociative identity disorder : “a person showing two or more “identities” or “personality states”
    – Body integrity identity disorder : “Sufferers of BIID are uncomfortable with a part of their body”

    Would we pander to someone’s delusion that they were Joan of Arc or or the Duke of Wellington ?

  7. John Carins says:

    You are 100% right. Cultural Marxism is the biggest danger to our society. UKIP is the only party that has identified this – it is by far after ensuring Brexit the most important issue.

  8. JOHN DODDS says:

    The government has not shown any reason for pushing this Gender Agenda, just started putting it out! I wish someone would tell the British public why this Agenda was necessary

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *